The U.N.
When is enough enough?
This windbag of an institution should condemn ITSELF for what it currently allows.
Let me remind you:
The UN allowed itself to be partisan in the Balkan peninnsula only after nearly complete genocide took place. Genocide Pres. Bush Sr. allowed to happen. A genocide my family heard me deplore as it was happening.
The UN Security Council voted on and PASSED resolution 1441, and 1472 in favor of military action as a last resort against Iraq.
In resolution 1483 the UN acknowledges the US/UK authority in Iraq.
In resolution 1511 the UN tells itself to increase its own presence in Iraq.
My question is: "WHERE THE HELL IS THE U.N. AS INNOCENT PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE BOMBED??????"
Now the public hears that our sandal wearing friend saddam diverted the "oil for food" program money to terrorists, and that the UN is going to open an "investigation".
NO WONDER that koffi's office had so many bugs! yeesh, not only did the US and UK have an interest in what was happening, so did all those neat euro-buddies of ours - France, Germany, and Russia.
When does this UN get demolished and eventually rebuilt?
Why do the Democrats take this institution so seriously? so much so, that if Bill Clinton ran for a third term, the US would have fully disarmed and GIVEN ALL our tech to the asking - namely China.
WHY HAVEN'T ANY UN TROOPS BEEN DISPATCHED TO IRAQ? IS IT TO PUNISH THE US?
It's obvious that the iraqi people are naturally benevolent. have you heard about the towns which shut their lights off so the US chopper pilots can fly in and use their nightsight glasses? the iraqi want peace the way any society after war wants peace. they want to grieve the loss of the hundreds of thousands of innocently killed individuals they've lost in the last 20+ years.
Here is the reason why no troops have been dispatched. It's because the old guard in Europe is tired of the US's agenda. They don't want to take orders anymore, they think the US is arrogant. Yes, maybe we are, and we've exported our Disney trash and hip hop music, but hell, if a Euro-renaissance was going to take place in the meantime, WHERE IS IT?
The US is the best this planet's got going right now. If the rest of the world wants a cultural war - so be it - but let's NOT involve the deaths of innocent Iraqis.
Truly, the blood of the American soldiers are on the hands of every dissenter at the UN.
Bottom line is, although the US "occupation" of Iraq looks bad right now, the mission/goal to free the Iraqi people from a dictator, bring stability to the region, and allow self rule was a good one.
Life would be better if the countries of the world (like France and Germany) would join in and CLEAN the US's mess. Instead they sit on the sidelines or run away (thanks Spain). Who REALLY ends up paying? the average Iraqi citizen. the same citizen who now signs up for the national police force and is blown up by terrorists.
This windbag of an institution should condemn ITSELF for what it currently allows.
Let me remind you:
The UN allowed itself to be partisan in the Balkan peninnsula only after nearly complete genocide took place. Genocide Pres. Bush Sr. allowed to happen. A genocide my family heard me deplore as it was happening.
The UN Security Council voted on and PASSED resolution 1441, and 1472 in favor of military action as a last resort against Iraq.
In resolution 1483 the UN acknowledges the US/UK authority in Iraq.
In resolution 1511 the UN tells itself to increase its own presence in Iraq.
My question is: "WHERE THE HELL IS THE U.N. AS INNOCENT PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE BOMBED??????"
Now the public hears that our sandal wearing friend saddam diverted the "oil for food" program money to terrorists, and that the UN is going to open an "investigation".
NO WONDER that koffi's office had so many bugs! yeesh, not only did the US and UK have an interest in what was happening, so did all those neat euro-buddies of ours - France, Germany, and Russia.
When does this UN get demolished and eventually rebuilt?
Why do the Democrats take this institution so seriously? so much so, that if Bill Clinton ran for a third term, the US would have fully disarmed and GIVEN ALL our tech to the asking - namely China.
WHY HAVEN'T ANY UN TROOPS BEEN DISPATCHED TO IRAQ? IS IT TO PUNISH THE US?
It's obvious that the iraqi people are naturally benevolent. have you heard about the towns which shut their lights off so the US chopper pilots can fly in and use their nightsight glasses? the iraqi want peace the way any society after war wants peace. they want to grieve the loss of the hundreds of thousands of innocently killed individuals they've lost in the last 20+ years.
Here is the reason why no troops have been dispatched. It's because the old guard in Europe is tired of the US's agenda. They don't want to take orders anymore, they think the US is arrogant. Yes, maybe we are, and we've exported our Disney trash and hip hop music, but hell, if a Euro-renaissance was going to take place in the meantime, WHERE IS IT?
The US is the best this planet's got going right now. If the rest of the world wants a cultural war - so be it - but let's NOT involve the deaths of innocent Iraqis.
Truly, the blood of the American soldiers are on the hands of every dissenter at the UN.
Bottom line is, although the US "occupation" of Iraq looks bad right now, the mission/goal to free the Iraqi people from a dictator, bring stability to the region, and allow self rule was a good one.
Life would be better if the countries of the world (like France and Germany) would join in and CLEAN the US's mess. Instead they sit on the sidelines or run away (thanks Spain). Who REALLY ends up paying? the average Iraqi citizen. the same citizen who now signs up for the national police force and is blown up by terrorists.
posted by impresario | 7:13 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home