First Rumination

here is a perfect example of how a relatively small set of statements indicate a larger uglier picture. i monitor hugh hewitt's blog. sometimes i listen to his radio show. since john kerry has said he was in cambodia during christmas hugh has made it a cornerstone of his blog and show. never mind it's been about 3 weeks and the news has been SLOW.

now his hard work is starting to pay off. today's blog at hughhewitt.com points to another blogger on this network who is a navy seal. he gives several good reasons why kerry might never have travelled to cambodia. kerry has attached his travels to cambodia as ferry help to a cia agent. this agent even gave his hat to kerry who carries it around in a false bottomed briefcase. this story reported in the washington times on it's front page in june of last year.

the story is a story. some speculate kerry moved the date to imply nixon was directing an illegal (or un-sensitive) war. then the time has been moved to january. now, in an important development, the blogger at http://froggyruminations.blogspot.com/ explains why in simple terms less than likely kerry skippered the cia man to his destination.

i urge you to read the blogger and hughhewitt.com's 2:35p and 1:50p entries for august 16th.

implications here are that kerry, who is already rumoured to suffer from ptsd (post traumatic stress disorder), is lying. if so, this is VERY serious, as he isn't even in office yet - where we all know lying under oath is considered a badge of honor (right william?)... ;)

put your thinking cap on.